Week 5
You, yes, you are in a media loop. I am too. We all are; until we make a conscious decision to step outside of the loop and gain perspective. And, yes, some are more entrenched into one side of the media than others, but modern day algorithms and data collection make it almost impossible to escape a media bias when consuming content. When we do find genuinely reliable sources on media platforms, interacting with these platforms will enable your algorithm to continue cycling similar content; even if we are interacting with them negatively. In most forms of media whether it be tv, youtube, or instagram, the platform and its creators view engagement as the most important thing and will go at lengths to keep users to stay on the platform. Recycled content is basically inescapable as anything that gets high amounts of views is shown over and over again in a plethora of media.
All of this goes to say, we can perfectly curate our following or reporters to trust list, but we should always be gaining context to an issue. The book, Verified, discusses this issue on pages 111-113, highlighting how knowledge is a moving network, always gaining new perspectives and bits of information from field experts. Often when doing research we turn to someone or something we trust to report the issue at hand back to us, Verified describes the common end goal of this research to be “to summarize the current state of knowledge regarding the issue of certainty… and the issue of consensus” (112). When turning to one person, we are really still seeking out the views of multiple experts and their opinions on the topic, even if we don’t realize it.
This shows that we cannot always blindly trust the media bubble that is mainstream media platforms. There are lots of reputable reporters out there and they can be amazing starting points for gaining knowledge, but we need to remind ourselves the things they are reporting on are an accumulation of knowledge or opinions provided by different outlets, sometimes experts, sometimes not. It is our job to examine the context of these claims and make sure we understand the pool of knowledge at play on a topic before immediately reacting and taking the chance of spreading misinformation. Remaining ignorant to the biases at play, or ignoring your ability to easily fact-check things is what allows misinformation to flourish; especially when people react (engage with the post) before doing outside research.
“Taking in the full set of results before you click increases the chances you’ll find something reliable rather than clicking away at the first thing that catches your eye.” –Verified (100).
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.