A Woman Living in a Man’s World (revision)

Formerly titled: She Can’t Speak or Think, She’s the Perfect Woman!

  1. One must not voice her own opinion.
  2. One’s sole ambition must be to become a wife and then a mother.
  3. One must be submissive to her husband.
  4. One must maintain a desirable figure to maintain her husband’s affection.
  5. One must never see herself as a human being, because she will never be treated like one.

If I’m being honest, I resent this aspect of society. The part that isolates women and treats us as objects.

Answer?

It’s not.

And women, for centuries, have asserted this protest. We have made it known that we are people. In a perfect world, this demand would be heeded, and we would be treated as such in all walks of life. But in a perfect would, misogyny wouldn’t exist. So…here we are.

To jump over centuries of oppression and resistance…the 21st century has opened up the seemingly endless possibilities that misogyny can take the form of. One of which being a replacement of a woman.

You might ask yourself: How?

Answer?

A.I.

I saw a video recently from the BBC World Service that filled me with so much dread and disgust I just knew I had to talk about it. This isn’t a surprising emergence at all. Something about A.I. appeals to people. Something about these A.I. models or programs like ChatGPT or Claude scratch that connectivity itch that people have. Does it matter that they’re not real? Absolutely not. What matters is that they are tailored for you. They are meant to be agreeable. They are not meant to be human.

So even though this isn’t a new occurrence, this video still left a bad taste in my mouth.

Why is that?

The popularity of this A.I. model and others like it is what drew my eye. The consumer base is mainly composed of men. The fact that these models are made to draw in the eye and change at a whim is particularly disturbing.

Whether you like the typical IG influencer or not, the fact that something like this exists in an already over saturated field is quite alarming. It raises the question as to what makes an A.I. model so appealing.

A.I. models are something women can never be, malleable and thoughtless. They represent the most desirable version of a woman in a misogynistic society. The sheer fact that they are no more than inanimate entities and yet attract the same attention as human models asserts an unavoidable truth in this society.

Women are seems as objects.

To see that this model is receiving advertising opportunities treats our contributions as disposable. The consumers love the look of a woman, but they detest the fact that she may have a brain and full autonomy.

I look to this video (and troubling trend) as a reminder. In a world that is not made to protect or value you, you must find that within yourself. Misogyny is embedded into the very fabric of society. We will likely never escape this. The inevitable truth is that we must take this truth and combat it.

  1. You must make yourself known in this world, lest you’ll be forgotten.
  2. You have to be comfortable with being uncomfortable. Doing things that bring you anxiety, yet present a net good for all.
  3. This harkens back to #2, be a feminist. That means analyzing your feeling about women and womanhood and asking yourself “Is this truly what I believe?”


Posted

in

by

Tags:

Comments

2 responses to “A Woman Living in a Man’s World (revision)”

  1. LKSOC1004 Avatar
    LKSOC1004

    To expand on this idea, I think that Marx does has a good summation of misogyny and patriarchy in capitalist contexts. Marx makes the distinction between an object and a commodity where an object has a use value i.e., it helps us do something and a commodity has both a use value and an exchange value. A commodity has a dual purpose or dual character. I would say that women can certainly be objectified, but that we also see the commodification of women as a product or service. Women are treated first as objects, then are exchanged for some market value as a commodity as well.

    What I’m getting at here is that the AI model very much replicates the commodification of women in other modelling or beauty-related contexts. They’re sold in exchange for profit, for the expanse of capital. The striking difference with the AI model is that it appears to be a distilled and concentrated version of this where the very essence of a woman (at least the conventionally accepted apparent identity of a woman) is sold at a market value instead of a real person.

  2. goosefeet22 Avatar
    goosefeet22

    This post is so well done. Sometimes it feels hard to even express the ways that being a woman can minimize our existence. That video also stood out to me, because it really is a representation of all the ways women can be commodified, like you mention. There was a pit in my stomach watching the video because, for some reason, it feels like if we can’t even use our sexuality as a value holder, than what do we have? Obviously, this idea comes from deeply ingrained misogynist beliefs imbued upon generations of women, but that doesn’t change the fact that it is one of the few things women have been able to leverage as “power.” There is something beyond unsettling about the ways that men are able to see sex and not a person, and how even though that has been an issue for quite a long time, it is becoming more dangerous and more separated from reality than ever before.

Leave a Reply