week 9

With applications like YouTube, TikTok, and Instagram, it is easy to waste time mindlessly scrolling through the myriad of short videos uploaded. Though interesting and grabs our attention easily, it is not always what it seems. There are a few steps to consider before believing what is being seen. It must be observed thoroughly, and some investigation must be done.

One must understand what they are looking at in the video. Is it AI? Is it made by a human? Is it real or fake? Finding other coverage can be easy. Look up anything related to the video, and see what pops up. Reading comments can help as well. These can help figure out if news coverage is real or AI slop. Sometimes it is harder to find the truth; this is exactly what propagandists and con artists do. They feed on the impatient because investigation and reflection are time-consuming. Uploading old videos to make them seem like they are modern is a trick that is done to fool the public. Con artists and propagandists are sneaky—watch out for links as well.

If someone describes a controversial video and sends you a link, sometimes you still must do some investigating. Unfortunately, as close as you may be to that person, do not assume the source is fully accurate. The longer the video, the easier it is to believe; the shorter it is, the more likely you are to question it. Molloy’s law suggests that the tighter a video is clipped, the less inclined you should be the share it. Always seek the longer video. As the adage goes, measure twice, cut once.” It is important to think before sharing a video with someone else. The internet is already riddled with false information, spreading across like a disease. Check the facts, do some digging, and make sure what is being shared is facts.

This was another interesting chapter in Verified, written by Mike Caulfield and Sam Wineburg. People say, “Do not believe everything you see on the internet,” yet these are the ones still spreading inaccurate information. It is not easy to tell what is real and what is not. I agree that con artists and propagandists feed on the impatient. If you are like me, sometimes you watch videos before bed. Sometimes I will do some deep dive into the research, and sometimes I will not. It is hard to tell what is real these days. It is sad as well. This chapter was helpful to recap.


Posted

in

by

Tags:

Comments

One response to “week 9”

  1. LKSOC1004 Avatar
    LKSOC1004

    The length of video is kind of concerning to me personally. On the one hand, if there is serious, real video that you need to investigate, I’m sure there’s a way to find a longer or more contextualized version. However, AI content is likely only going to be as long as what you originally see. AI video is often made for reels or TikTok, so its not going to render anything longer than the prompt demands. It’s not going to have more context that got cropped out because it simply didn’t generate it.

    I did run into a concerning example recently. I like to watch videos on astrophysics and space. There is YT creator named “Astrum” that I watch semi-frequently, and he pops up pretty often on my homepage. I saw a video come up in the recommended section and it wasn’t an Astrum video, but the voiceover in the video was Astrum’s voice. I listened for about 15 minutes before going to the comments to find out that the channel wasn’t his. Astrum has multiple channels, so I didn’t think anything about this video being on a channel different than I had seen before. Plenty of creators have 3 or 4 channels.

    As soon as I checked the comments, I realized that this channel:
    A) Was not Astrum’s channel
    B) Was not a friend of Astrum
    C) The video creator used an AI to model Astrum’s voice and create similar animations to the ones that Astrum uses.

    That entire experience made me worried because, in cases like that, there’s no real immediate tell that something is mega off.

Leave a Reply